|
|
||||||||
1 Departments of Bioengineering, Box 351721, and 2 Chemistry, Box 351700, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195;
* corresponding authors, stayton{at}u.washington.edu and drobny{at}u.washington.edu
Abstract Introduction Statherin Background Structure of Statherin on HAP Molecular Dynamic Properties of Statherin on HAP Chimeric Statherin/Biofunctional Peptides for Biomaterial/Tissue Engineering Coatings Summary Acknowledgments REFERENCES
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key words. Biomineralization, molecular recognition, hydroxyapatite, biomaterials
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
At the level of fundamental science, it is important to note the paucity of molecular structure information available for biomineralization proteins in general, and in particular for mammalian proteins that directly control calcification processes in hard tissue. Even the most fundamental questions about how the proteins interact at the biomineral surfacesuch as their general structure and orientation on the calcium phosphate surfaces, or whether the acidic residues are truly interacting directly with the crystal surfaceremain largely uncharacterized at the experimental level. To develop a better structure-function-level understanding of protein-crystal molecular recognition, we have begun to utilize solid-state NMR techniques to determine the molecular structure of proteins and peptides on calcium phosphate surfaces. These same techniques have provided interesting molecular dynamics information for the proteins on the biomineral surface. In this review, we will highlight recent work that is providing insight into the structure and crystal recognition mechanisms of the salivary protein model system, but which also provides a general approach to the study of protein-crystal interactions in molecular detail. In addition, the molecular insight into natures strategy for crystal recognition has led to the design of peptides that connect the basic studies to applications in the biomaterials arena.
| Statherin Background |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The effects of native statherin on hydroxyapatite growth dynamics have been extensively characterized by Nancollas and others (Aoba and Moreno, 1984; Johnsson et al., 1991). Nancollas has demonstrated that N-terminal peptides from statherin also display functional activities in controlling HAP growth (Raj et al., 1992a,b; Wikiel et al., 1994). The statherins also serve an important functional role as boundary lubricants (Douglas et al., 1991) and in periodonto-pathology as mediators of bacterial adhesion (Amano et al., 1996; Nagata et al., 1997). Secondary sequence predictions suggest that the N-terminus has a propensity for
-helix formation, and circular dichroism studies have demonstrated the presence of some
-helical conformation in solution (Douglas et al., 1991; Gururaja and Levine, 1996). Statherin has been reported as unstructured in aqueous solution by solution NMR techniques (Naganagowda et al., 1998), although the N-terminal 15-amino-acid domain was found to have some
-helical structure in the structure-inducing solvent trifluoroethanol.
| Structure of Statherin on HAP |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A potential route to solving this challenge is for the protein to be relatively unfolded in solution, and to utilize crystal-binding energy to stabilize a folded conformation where the side-chains are optimized for interactions with the crystal surface (Fig. 1
). We have begun to test whether statherin matches this structural profile by determining its structure on model HAP crystals. Three complementary structural techniques were utilized for determination of the backbone structure of the N-terminal binding domain of statherin. Dipolar Recoupling in a Windowless Sequence (DRAWS) and Double Quantum DRAWS (DQDRAWS) are homonuclear dipolar recoupling techniques that measure the distance between adjacent backbone carbonyl carbons. These distances provide a model-free determination of the backbone torsion angle
, which can be directly related to local secondary structure and also to the structural heterogeneity at specific backbone atoms. These techniques are particularly powerful when combined with Rotational Echo Double Resonance (REDOR), a heteronuclear recoupling technique that provides distance measurements across putative
-helical or ß-sheet hydrogen bonding interactions (i.e., i to i+4 positions in a helix). It should be noted that while isotropic chemical shifts of proteins can yield qualitative indications of secondary structure in homogeneous systems, their values can be influenced by the bulk magnetic susceptibility of inorganic surfaces. We have found that chemical shift analysis is thus of limited value in determining secondary structures for peptides and proteins on HAP. Fortunately, the dipolar recoupling techniques provide an independent and more quantitative approach that has yielded the desired structural information.
|
angle was determined with the DRAWS and DQDRAWS techniques at the pS2pS3 positions, while REDOR was used to measure the (i) to (i+4) distance with pS3F7 and L8G12 labeling schemes (Fig. 2
-helical on the HAP surface. The strongly acidic N-6 region displays a nearly ideal
-helical distance of 4.2 Å across the pS3F7 hydrogen bond, while the helix is more extended at 4.8 Å across the L8G12 hydrogen bonding position. Low structural dispersion was observed, particularly at the acidic N-terminus, but also out to the 12th amino acid, which suggests that there is a relatively narrow range of molecular structures on the surface.
|
-helical structure in this highly acidic region (Fig. 2
-helix conformation (or both). Similar results were observed in recent solid-state NMR studies of N-terminal statherin peptide fragments that were conducted in the lyophilized state both on and off the HAP surface (Long et al., 1998; Shaw et al., 2000a,b). The acidic N-terminus of the peptide was in an extended conformation both on and off the surface, while residues 712 were in a partly helical conformation.
It has been previously proposed that the
-helix motif could be used as a scaffolding mechanism for aligning acidic side-chain residues with HAP (Hauschka and Carr, 1982; DeOliviera and Laursen, 1997) by a lattice matching mechanism, or it could align with the surface through a more general electrostatic complementarity. The initial structural characterization shows that the statherin N-terminal binding domain is indeed helical, and further demonstrates the importance of water in the acidic N-terminus interaction with the HAP surface. While the comparison with the solution structure of statherin must be made with caution, because the solution structure is not yet available to the same precision, it appears that the N-terminus is more structured on the surface at the phosphorylated serines and carboxylate-containing aspartic and glutamic acid positions. If verified, this differential folding at the acidic domain between the unbound and bound states would be consistent with a functional role for structural disorder in crystal engineering by acidic proteins, perhaps in response to the aforementioned challenge of matching side-chain positions to inhibit crystal growth without promoting nucleation.
| Molecular Dynamic Properties of Statherin on HAP |
|---|
|
|
|---|
relaxation constants and cross-polarization efficiencies. The principal elements of the motionally pre-averaged CSA tensor provide dynamic information on time scales fast compared with the CSA (i.e., >>20 kHz at a magnetic field of 11.75 Tesla). The T1
measurements extend the dynamic information available to faster time scales falling between 10-3 and 10-5 seconds.
The N15 statherin peptide was characterized at six labeled positions ranging from the N-terminus to near the C-terminus. Fig. 3
compares the spectra obtained for lyophilized vs. hydrated samples at these six positions. As expected, there is a large overall increase in peptide dynamics in the hydrated samples, except at the phosphoserine backbone positions, which remain strikingly immobile in both states. There is increasing motion as the label is moved toward the C-terminus, with large-amplitude dynamic frequencies measured on the order of or greater than 10-5 seconds at the I11 and G12 positions. 13C T1
measurements provided complementary information, with values for the lyophilized surface-adsorbed samples of > 25 msec, demonstrating that there was little motion on the kilohertz timescale. Similar values of > 25 msec were obtained for the hydrated pS2pS3 positions, while significantly shorter values of 11 msec and 3 msec were measured for the F7L8 and I11G12 positions, respectively. These results at the middle and C-terminal ends of the peptide demonstrated increased dynamic frequencies of greater than 103 Hz. The peptide is thus strongly bound at the acidic N-terminus, but is surprisingly mobile and dynamic at the middle and C-terminal regions.
|
values were similar for the lyophilized and hydrated states, with similar cross-polarization efficiencies (Fig. 4
relaxation times, along with a significant loss of cross-polarization efficiencies at the F7, L8, I11, and G12 positions in the hydrated samples. Taken together, these studies demonstrate that the regions outside the acidic N-terminus display protein dynamic modes with frequencies of 10-3 to 10-5 sec, similar to those measured for the N15 peptide. While these results are qualitatively similar to those achieved with the N15 peptide, a comparison of the CSA at the I11 and G12 positions shows that the statherin dynamic mode exhibits a smaller amplitude, since it is nearly unchanged compared with the significantly narrowed CSA for the peptide. The smaller amplitude is consistent with the larger size of the full protein, but could also include differences due to the stabillization of the backbone dynamics by tertiary folding interactions, protein-protein interactions on the crystal surface, or different side-chain interactions with the crystal surface. It is clear from these dynamic studies that the binding footprint is largely confined to the anionic stretch of phosphorylated serines and acidic side-chains at the N-terminus.
|
| Chimeric Statherin/Biofunctional Peptides for Biomaterial/Tissue Engineering Coatings |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-helical structure toward the C-terminus of the N15 domain, coupled with its mobility and weak interactions with the crystal surface (Fig. 5
|
vß3-mediated adhesion of a model integrin-sorted Mo
v melanoma cell line. Solid-state NMR experiments showed that the mobility and dynamics of the RGD portion of the hydrated fusion peptide are retained on the HAP surface, despite the presence of the acidic aspartic acid side-chain (Fig. 6
|
vß3 integrin rather than the
5ß1 fibronectin integrin, and that the
2ß1 integrin was the primary target of the SN15-PDGEA peptide. While both the SN15-PGRGDS and SN15-PDGEA peptides directed adhesion events leading to FAK phosphorylation, only the SN15-PDGEA peptide led to MAPK pathway activation as monitored by ERK phosphorylation. These peptides might thus find applications as tissue-engineering or biomaterial coatings that direct integrin-specific signaling pathway activation.
|
| Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Aoba T, Moreno EC, Hay DI (1984). Inhibition of apatite crystal growth by the amino-terminal segment of human salivary acidic proline-rich proteins. Calcif Tissue Int 36:651658.[Medline]
Campbell AA, Ebrahimpour A, Perez L, Smesko SA, Nancollas GH (1989). The dual role of polyelectrolytes and proteins as mineralization promoters and inhibitors of calcium oxalate monohydrate. Calcif Tissue Int 45:122128.[Medline]
Coe FL, Parks JH, Asplin JR (1992). The pathogenesis and treatment of kidney stones. New Engl J Med 327:11411152.[Medline]
DeOliviera DB, Laursen RA (1997). Control of calcite crystal morphology by a peptide designed to bind to a specific surface. J Am Chem Soc 119:1062710631.
Douglas WH, Reeh ES, Ramasubbu N, Raj PA, Bhandary KK, Levine MJ (1991). Statherin: a major boundary lubricant of human saliva. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 180:9197.[Medline]
Gilbert M, Shaw WJ, Long JR, Nelson K, Drobny GP, Giachelli CM, et al. (2000). Chimeric peptides of statherin and osteopontin that bind hydroxyapatite and mediate cell adhesion. J Biol Chem 275:1621316218.
Gilbert M, Giachelli C, Stayton PS (2003). Biomimetic peptides that engage specific integrin-dependent signaling pathways and bind to calcium phosphate surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res 67: 6970.
Gururaja TL, Levine MJ (1996). Solid-phase synthesis and characterization of human salivary statherin: a tyrosine-rich phosphoprotein inhibitor of calcium phosphate precipitation. Peptide Res 9:283289.
Hauschka PV, Carr SA (1982). Calcium-dependent alpha-helical structure in osteocalcin. Biochemistry 21:25382547.[Medline]
Hay DI, Smith DJ, Schluckebier SK, Moreno EC (1984). Relationship between concentration of human salivary statherin and inhibition of calcium phosphate precipitation in stimulated human parotid saliva. J Dent Res 63:857863.
Jensen JL, Lamkin MS, Oppenheim FG (1992). Adsorption of human salivary proteins to hydroxyapatite: a comparison between whole saliva and glandular secretions. J Dent Res 71:15691576.
Johnsson M, Richardson CF, Bergey DJ, Levine MJ, Nancollas GH (1991). The effects of human salivary cystatins and statherin on hydroxyapatite crystallization. Arch Oral Biol 36:631636.[Medline]
Long JR, Dindot JL, Zebroski H, Kiihne S, Clark RH, Campbell AA, et al. (1998). A peptide that inhibits hydroxyapatite growth exists in an extended conformation on the crystal surface. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:1208312087.
Long JR, Shaw WJ, Stayton PS, Drobny GP (2001). Structure and dynamics of hydrated statherin on hydroxyapatite via solid state NMR. Biochemistry 40:1545115455.[Medline]
McCarty DJ (1994). Crystals and arthritis. Disease of the Month June:258299.
Moreno EC, Varughese K, Hay DI (1979). Effect of human salivary proteins on the precipitation kinetics of calcium phosphate. Calcif Tissue Int 28:716.[Medline]
Naganagowda GA, Gururaja TL, Levine MJ (1998). Delineation of conformational preferences in human salivary statherin by 1H, 31P NMR and CD studies: sequential assignment and structure-function correlations. J Biomolec Struct Dyn 16:91107.[Medline]
Nagata H, Sharma A, Sojar HT, Amano A, Levine MJ, Genco RJ (1997). The role of carboxyl terminal region of Porphyromonas gingivalis fimbrillin in binding to salivary proteins. Infect Immun 65:422427.[Abstract]
Raj PA, Marcus E, Sukumaran DK (1992a). Structure of human salivary statherin-5 in aqueous and non-aqueous solutions. Biopolymers 45:5167.
Raj PA, Johnsson M, Levine MJ, Nancollas GH (1992). Salivary statherin. Dependence on sequence, charge, hydrogen bonding potency, and helical conformation for adsorption to hydroxyapatite and inhibition of mineralization. J Biol Chem 267:59685976.
Ramasubbu N, Thomas LM, Bhandary KK, Levine MJ (1993). Structural characteristics of human salivary statherin: a model for boundary lubrication at the enamel surface. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 4: 363370.
Schlesinger DH, Hay DI (1977). Complete covalent structure of statherin, a tyrosine-rich acidic peptide which inhibits calcium phosphate precipitation from human parotid saliva. J Biol Chem 252:16891695.
Schoen FJ, Harasaki H, Kim KM, Anderson HC, Levy RJ (1988). Biomaterial-associated calcification: pathology, mechanisms, and strategies for prevention. J Biomed Mater Res 22:1136.[Medline]
Schwartz SS, Hay DI, Schluckebier SK (1992). Inhibition of calcium phosphate precipitation by human salivary statherin: structure-activity relationships. Calcif Tissue Int 50:511517.[Medline]
Shaw WJ, Long JR, Dindot JL, Campbell AA, Stayton PS, Drobny GP (2000a). Determination of statherin N-terminal peptide conformation on hydroxyapatite crystals. J Am Chem Soc 122:17091716.
Shaw WJ, Long JR, Stayton PS, Drobny GP (2000b). A solid state NMR study of dynamics in a hydrated salivary peptide adsorbed to hydroxyapatite. J Am Chem Soc 122:71187119.
Waite JH, Qin X (2001). Polyphosphoprotein from the adhesive pads of Mytilus edulis. Biochemistry 40:28872893.[Medline]
Wikiel K, Burke EM, Perich JW, Reynolds EC, Nancollas GH (1994). Hydroxyapatite mineralization and demineralization in the presence of synthetic phosphorylated pentapeptides. Arch Oral Biol 39:715721.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Goobes, R. Goobes, O. Schueler-Furman, D. Baker, P. S. Stayton, and G. P. Drobny Folding of the C-terminal bacterial binding domain in statherin upon adsorption onto hydroxyapatite crystals PNAS, October 31, 2006; 103(44): 16083 - 16088. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. W. Moe and O. Bonny Genetic Hypercalciuria J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2005; 16(3): 729 - 745. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| IADR Journals | Advances in Dental Research ® | Journal of Dental Research ® | Critical Reviews (1990-2004) |