| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 Department of Stomatology, University of Otago School of Dentistry, PO Box 647, Dunedin, New Zealand; 2 Department of Oral and Dental Science, University of Bristol Dental School, Bristol BS1 2LY, United Kingdom
* corresponding author, robert.love{at}dent.otago.ac.nz;
(I) Introduction (II) Microbiology of Infection of the Pulpo-Dentin Complex (A) PULPO-DENTIN COMPLEX (B) INTRATUBULAR CONTENT AND DIFFUSION PROPERTIES (III) Bacterial Invasion of Coronal Dentin (A) ARIOUS DENTIN (B) NON-CARIOUS DENTIN (IV) Microflora of the Infected Root Canal (V) Bacterial Invasion of Radicular Dentin from the Root Canal (VI) Bacterial Invasion of Radicular Dentin from a Periodontal Pocket (VII) Bacterial Invasion in vitro (VIII) Factors Influencing Tubule Invasion by Bacteria (A) DENTIN STRUCTURE (B) BACTERIAL ADHESION (IX) Summary and Future Prospects REFERENCES
| Abstract |
|---|
 Top Next |
|---|
Key words. Dentinal tubule, endodontic infections, oral bacterial adhesion, caries, invasion of dentin
| (I) Introduction |
|---|
|
TopPreviousNext |
|---|
) is sterile and is primarily involved in the production of dentin and in tooth sensibility. The pulp and dentin form a functional complex that is protected from exogenous substances in the oral cavity by the overlying enamel or cementum. When the pulpo-dentin complex becomes infected (Fig. 1A), the tissues react to the invading bacteria in an attempt to eradicate them. The ability of the complex to perform this function should not be underestimated, since the tissues are richly endowed with immunocompetent processes. However, in clinical terms, if the route of infection is not eradicated by these natural processes, or by operative procedures, then the burden of bacteria invading the complex overcomes the defenses and causes pulp disease, e.g., pulpitis, necrosis, and infection of the pulp chamber and root canal.
|
). Bacterial metabolites and toxic products arising from bacteria present within the root canal diffuse into the periapical tissues and evoke inflammatory disease, e.g., apical periodontitis, which is characterized by resorption of alveolar bone (Fig. 1B), while localized areas of root resorption may also occur. In situations where the periodontal ligament has been damaged, e.g., after dental trauma, an infected root canal can induce extensive and rapid inflammatory root resorption. Bacterially induced periapical disease usually begins as a chronic inflammation and manifests histologically as a periapical granuloma. An acute apical periodontitis of endodontic origin indicates that the host defenses are unable to control the bacterial insult. This may be due to bacteria becoming established within the periapical tissues, with subsequent abscess formation, or due to the presence of specific bacteria within the root canal that are able to induce tissue destruction. The bacterial toxins and acute inflammatory response characteristically cause swelling and pain. The main goal of endodontic treatment is to eliminate bacteria from the root canal system and to prevent them from infecting or re-infecting the pulp, root canal, or periapical tissues. Successful treatment depends upon a sound understanding of the causative factors of the disease process. Miller (1890) first demonstrated the bacterial invasion of dentinal tubules of both carious and non-carious dentin and reported that the tubule microflora consisted of cocci and rods. It was not until the late 1950s that experimental evidence clearly established the fundamental role of bacteria in dental caries and in pulp and periapical disease. Keyes (1960) was able to show that dental caries did not develop in germ-free animals fed a range of diets. Later, Kakehashi et al. (1965) demonstrated that pulp and periapical disease occurred in surgically exposed rat molar pulp only when bacteria were present in the oral cavity. In gnotobiotic (germ-free) rats, exposed pulps remained healthy and initiated repair by way of dentin bridging of the exposure.
Invasion of dentinal tubules by bacteria from supra- or subgingival plaque occurs whenever dentin is exposed in the oral cavity. This can be through caries lesions, restorative or periodontal procedures, tooth wear, enamel or dentin cracks, or dental trauma (Tronstad and Langeland, 1971; Pashley, 1990; Peters et al., 1995; Love, 1996a). Bacteria present within coronal dentinal tubules may be responsible for pulp and periapical disease (Brännström and Nyborg, 1971) (Fig. 1A), while those within radicular dentinal tubules may be responsible for continued root canal infection (Haapasalo and Ørstavik, 1987) (Fig. 1C).
Dental caries involving the crown of the tooth can affect people at any age from when the crown erupts into the mouth. By contrast, root-surface caries occurs only when there has been loss of periodontal attachment and exposure of cementum or radicular dentin; hence it affects mainly adults. Unchecked, the advancing bacterial front of the carious process will result in infection of the dental pulp and root canal system, which will lead to periapical disease. However, bacteria that are associated with an infected root canal differ from those primarily associated with dental caries. Thus, although streptococci and Actinomyces are major components of dental plaque (Jenkinson and Lamont, 1997) and may initiate tubule and pulpal infection, obligately anaerobic bacteria are commonly present in large numbers in the infected root canal.
Streptococci are the primary bacterial colonizers of the oral cavity, and adhesion of streptococci to the acquired pellicle is an essential first step in colonization of the tooth (Gibbons, 1989; Kolenbrander and London, 1993; Jenkinson and Lamont, 1997). Streptococci express multiple surface protein adhesins (Hasty et al., 1992) that allow cells to bind to a wide range of substrates found in the oral cavity, including other microbial cells, salivary components, host cells, or extracellular matrix or serum components (Jenkinson and Lamont, 1997). However, while there are considerable data on the mechanisms involved in the formation and development of dental plaque (Kolenbrander, 2000), relatively little is known about the mechanisms by which oral bacteria penetrate or invade dentin, and cause pulpitis, root canal infection, and periapical diseases. Advances in microbial sampling methods, and in growth and identification techniques, have provided much new information on the microbial components and complexes that are associated with endodontic and periodontal infections (Sundqvist, 1994; Socransky et al., 1998). This article will review current knowledge of the microbiology of dentinal tubule infections. It will also describe how recent developments have advanced our understanding of the microbial complexity of root canal and pulpal infections, and of the mechanisms by which some species of oral bacteria are able to invade dentin.
| (II) Microbiology of Infection of the Pulpo-Dentin Complex |
|---|
|
TopPreviousNext |
|---|
The dental pulp is encased by dentin and occupies a space commonly designated the pulp chamber in coronal dentin and the root canal in radicular dentin. Dentin is porous, hard, mineralized connective tissue composed primarily of hydroxyapatite-coated collagen type I fibrils. Other collagen types (III, V, and VI) and non-collagenous proteins and proteoglycans are present as minor components. The matrix is formed by pulp odontoblast cells, which begin secreting collagen at the dentino-enamel junction and then retreat centripetally, trailing odontoblast processes around which the dentin matrix is elaborated and mineralized. This results in primary and secondary dentin having a tubular nature. Tertiary or reparative dentin, which is laid down as a consequence of noxious stimuli, does not have a regular tubular form. Since the circumference of the peripheral part of the crown or root is larger than the circumference of the final pulp chamber or root canal space, the odontoblasts are forced closer together as they continue to lay down intertubular dentin. This results in changes in the relative proportions of dentinal tubules within different areas of the dentin and a characteristic S-shape course of the dentinal tubules. The number of dentinal tubules per mm2 varies from 15,000 at the dentino-enamel junction to 45,000 at the pulp (Garberoglio and Brännström, 1976). Deposition of intratubular (peritubular) dentin within the tubule results in narrowing of the tubule (Linde and Goldberg, 1993). Deposition is more advanced in superficial older dentin compared with dentin closer to the pulp, and this results in a tapered tubule with the largest dimensions at the pulp (approximately 2.5 µm in diameter) and the smallest dimensions at the dentino-enamel or dentino-cemental junction (approximately 0.9 µm in diameter) (Fig. 2). Thus, a tubule is normally larger in diameter than an average oral streptococcal cell (0.5-0.7 µm).
|
(B) INTRATUBULAR CONTENT AND DIFFUSION PROPERTIES
The composition of dentinal tubule fluid in vital dentin is not fully known; however, it resembles serum with proteins such as albumin and immunoglobulin G (IgG) being present (Knutsson et al., 1994). In addition, other blood proteins, such as fibrinogen, may be found in dentinal tubules after cavity preparation (Knutsson et al., 1994; Izumi et al., 1998). Dentinal fluid within non-vital root dentin is fluid originating from alveolar bone and periodontal ligament, while dentinal fluid within non-vital coronal dentin is likely to be derived from saliva.
Dentinal tubules may contain odontoblast processes, nerve fibers, and unmineralized collagen fibrils. Dai et al. (1991) examined the contents of dentinal tubules of permanent human incisor, canine, premolar, and molar teeth from patients whose ages ranged from 18 to 54 yrs. They found that unmineralized collagen was a major component within dentinal tubules, occurring in 65% of all tubules in inner dentin (closest to the pulp). In 16% of these tubules, the collagen was aggregated into large bundles that occupied more than one-fifth of the lumen. In middle dentin, the corresponding figures were 42 and 7%, and for outer dentin, 12 and 0%. These patterns of collagen distribution were similar for all tooth families and were unrelated to age, suggesting that collagen is continually laid down within dentinal tubules throughout life.
Dentin is very porous because of the tubular structure. However, the degree of permeability varies between different areas of a tooth and the number of patent dentinal tubules present (Pashley, 1990). The pulpo-dentin complex is normally protected from the oral cavity by the overlying enamel or cementum. Once caries, trauma, or restorative or periodontal procedures breach the integrity of this barrier, the tubules provide diffusion channels from the surface to the pulp. Bacteria can then invade these dentinal tubules, and bacterial products can diffuse across dentin to elicit pulpal reactions (Vojinovic et al., 1973; Bergenholtz, 1981). The pulp responds initially by mounting an inflammatory response that increases the outward flow of dentinal fluid (Maita et al., 1991; Vongsavan and Matthews, 1994), thereby reducing diffusion of noxious stimuli through the dentinal tubules. Molecules present within dentinal tubules such as albumin, fibrinogen, and IgG have been shown to decrease fluid flow through dentin in vitro (Pashley et al., 1982; Hahn and Overton, 1997). It is therefore likely that dentinal fluid components are involved in host defense, by both interacting directly with bacteria and products, and by reducing the permeability of dentin.
However, conditions that reduce the outward flow of dentinal fluid tend to increase the inward diffusion of exogenous substances. Pashley (1992) speculated that bacterial invasion of dentinal tubules would interfere more with outward fluid flow than with inward diffusion of noxious materials, due to the higher sensitivity of bulk fluid movement to changes in tubule radius, r (which varies with r4), compared with diffusion (which varies with r2). In vitro studies have demonstrated that fluid flow through dentin is indeed reduced by bacterial invasion of dentin (Michelich et al., 1980; Love et al., 1996). Reduced fluid flow might promote disease pathogenesis by allowing for an increased diffusion rate of destructive or toxic bacterial products toward the pulp. Continued stimulus results in the pulpo-dentin complex responding to the noxious challenge by activation of immunocompetent cells and inflammatory processes in the pulp and by decreasing the permeability of the dentin by the production of sclerotic or reparative dentin (for reviews, see Pashley, 1996; Jontell et al., 1998). When unchecked, bacterial invasion of dentinal tubules overcomes the pulpo-dentin defenses, resulting in infection of the pulp and root canal system.
| (III) Bacterial Invasion of Coronal Dentin |
|---|
|
TopPreviousNext |
|---|
Greater numbers of bacteria are recovered from superficial infected dentin compared with deeper dentin (Hoshino, 1985). The application of strict anaerobic sampling and cultivation methods always gives higher recoveries of bacteria, implying that the environment of carious dentin promotes survival of obligately anaerobic bacteria. Thus, species of Propionibacterium, Eubacterium, and Bifidobacterium dominate the microflora of deep carious dentin, with Actinomyces, Lactobacillus, and some streptococci, but rarely S. mutans, being present (Table 1). Gram-negative obligate anaerobes, e.g., Fusobacterium, are recovered in only very low numbers, if at all (Table 1). To identify and localize bacterial species within carious dentin, Ozaki et al. (1994) detected, by immunohistochemical techniques, specific bacteria within dentin samples from fissure, smooth-surface coronal, and root-surface caries. They found that mutans group streptococci were the predominant bacteria within dentin from fissure and smooth-surface coronal caries, with higher numbers in the shallow and middle layers of dentin compared with deep dentin. Other bacteria previously identified as being dominant members of the microflora of carious human dentin—such as Lactobacillus spp., Eubacterium alactolyticum, and F. nucleatum (Edwardsson, 1974; Hoshino, 1985)—were frequently detected, though their relative proportions were low (Table 1). Thus, the environment within superficial carious dentin favors growth of facultative anaerobes that are associated with the carious process, e.g., mutans streptococci, while the microflora deep within the dentin is dominated by obligately anaerobic organisms.
|
). Thus, the composition of the microflora associated with carious dentin differs quite considerably between coronal and root caries.
|
) (Tronstad and Langeland, 1971; Olgart et al., 1974). Inflammatory changes within the pulp are commonly observed and can be seen within a week of exposure (Olgart et al., 1974). Other studies have demonstrated that microleakage of oral bacteria around restorations allows for bacterial invasion of exposed dentinal tubules at the base of the cavity (Brännström and Nyborg, 1971; Vojinovic et al., 1973), resulting in pulpal inflammation (Vojinovic et al., 1973) or periapical disease (Ray and Trope, 1996). Likewise, microleakage through enamel cracks and fractures as a result of trauma may lead to bacterial invasion of the pulpo-dentin complex and act as a cause of pulpal disease (Love, 1996a). Hence, sealing of dentin from exogenous substances and bacteria in the oral cavity, in both vital and non-vital teeth, is a critical step in tooth restoration.
|
| (IV) Microflora of the Infected Root Canal |
|---|
|
TopPreviousNext |
|---|
In studies where strict avoidance of contamination is attempted, sampling has been done of teeth with intact pulp chamber walls (Sundqvist, 1976). Consequently, the bacteria that are detected in the root canal must have gained entry by invading dentinal tubules. Sundqvist (1976) studied the microflora of human teeth that had become non-vital as a result of trauma, but which otherwise were intact and caries-free. Utilizing strictly anaerobic sampling techniques, he demonstrated that bacteria could not be isolated from teeth with normal periapical tissue, while bacteria were regularly isolated from teeth from patients who had apical periodontitis. Likewise, Möller et al. (1981) showed that only devitalized and infected pulps of monkey teeth showed signs of apical periodontitis, whereas devitalized and uninfected pulps did not develop periapical bone destruction. The pioneering studies by Sundqvist (1976) and later by Möller et al. (1981) demonstrated that, in addition to streptococci, lactobacilli, and Actinomyces, obligately anaerobic species of Fusobacterium, Peptostreptococcus, Eubacterium, Propionibacterium, Veillonella, Wolinella, Prevotella, and Porphyromonas dominated the root canal microflora (Table 3). Other micro-organisms such as yeasts, e.g., Candida and Saccharomyces (Lana et al., 2001), and spirochetes, e.g., Treponema (Jung et al., 2000; Rôças et al., 2001), have been occasionally recovered from an infected root canal. Most of the oxygen-sensitive members of the root canal microflora are not readily cultivable without the strict application of anaerobic methods (Carlsson et al., 1977), and this may explain why, in earlier studies, many teeth with apical periodontitis did not appear to harbor bacteria in the root canal.
|
). A series of studies on the dynamics of experimental root canal infections of monkey teeth has shown that facultative anaerobic bacteria, mainly streptococci, are the first colonizers of the root canal, but that by 6 months, obligate anaerobes dominate the microflora. When combinations of bacterial strains, isolated originally from an endogenously infected root canal, were re-inoculated into further canals with devitalized tissue, the dominance of anaerobic bacteria was again established. Furthermore, the original proportions of the bacterial strains were re-established, despite equal numbers of the different strains being inoculated into the canals (Fabricius et al., 1982a,b). These observations support the notion that associations between specific bacteria enable the root canal microflora to grow and survive in a highly specialized and selective environment (Sundqvist, 1992a). Mixed root canal infections result in larger periapical lesions than do mono-infections (Fabricius et al., 1982a,b). However, while the components of the root canal microflora are well-established, it is interesting that no single bacterial species has been indicted as the major pulp and periapical pathogen in chronic asymptomatic conditions. P. gingivalis, which is strongly implicated in destructive adult periodontal disease (Socransky and Haffajee, 1992; Lamont and Jenkinson, 1998), is recovered in low numbers from asymptomatic chronic root canal infections (Sundqvist, 1994; Le Goff et al., 1997). However, numbers of Porphyromonas and Prevotella species increase dramatically when there are signs and symptoms of acute periapical infection (Haapasalo, 1989; Sundqvist et al., 1989; Hashioka et al., 1992). The dominance of Gram-negative species in the latter stages of root canal infection supports the evidence that a highly selective environment continues to develop within the root canal system. Moreover, mechanisms may exist that allow these Gram-negative obligate anaerobes, e.g., .Porphyromonas and Prevotella species, to penetrate dentin, even though the bacteria are not routinely isolated from the tubule microflora.
The microflora of carious and cavitated dentin of teeth with pulpitis is similar to that previously reported for intact carious dentin (Hahn et al., 1990) (Table 1). Gram-positive organisms predominate, especially Lactobacillus spp. and streptococci. Gram-negative bacteria, e.g., P. intermedia, are found in lower numbers in superficial to deep dentin, but are more prevalent within dentin at the pulpal wall. Investigating the degree of cellular infiltrate and degenerative changes in the pulps of teeth with cavitated carious dentin, Massey et al. (1993) reported no association between the microbial load within the dentin and histopathology of the pulp. However, there was a positive correlation between the presence of P. intermedia and P. melaninogenica and extensive inflammation of the pulp.
| (V) Bacterial Invasion of Radicular Dentin from the Root Canal |
|---|
|
TopPreviousNext |
|---|
) and may be responsible for persistent root canal infection (Haapasalo and Ørstavik, 1987; Ørstavik and Haapasalo, 1990). Shovelton (1964) examined histologically 97 extracted, clinically non-vital teeth and found that 61 of the teeth showed bacterial penetration of the radicular dentinal tubules. The numbers of tubules containing bacteria were highly variable from tooth to tooth and among sections of an individual tooth. The depth of penetration by bacteria into the tubules was also found to be variable. It was noted that the presence of bacteria within the tubules was related to the clinical history of the tooth, such that chronic infections had more bacterial invasion and that tubule invasion did not occur immediately after the bacteria appeared in the root canal. These observations were similar to those reported in later histological studies on the invasion of non-carious coronal dentin (Lundy and Stanley, 1969; Brännström and Nyborg, 1971; Tronstad and Langeland, 1971; Vojinovic et al., 1973; Olgart et al., 1974).
The microflora within radicular dentinal tubules of teeth with infected root canals (Ando and Hoshino, 1990) resembles that of deep layers of carious coronal dentin (Edwardsson, 1974; Hoshino, 1985) (Table 1). Lactobacilli, streptococci, and Propionibacterium spp. are predominant, with other bacteria such as Gram-positive anaerobic cocci, Eubacterium spp., and Veillonella spp. being present in low numbers. Obligately anaerobic Gram-negative bacteria were recovered in very low numbers or not at all (Edwardsson, 1974; Hoshino, 1985; Ando and Hoshino, 1990), but are known to be present in infected root canals, as previously discussed. The inability to detect fastidious anaerobes within invaded coronal or radicular dentin may have been due simply to difficulties in cultivating these bacteria. By utilizing specific antisera, Ozaki et al. (1994) demonstrated that P. endodontalis was present, albeit in low numbers, within dentinal tubules of carious dentin. Recently, Peters et al. (2001) demonstrated that the flora recovered from mid-root radicular dentin of teeth with apical periodontitis of endodontic origin was similar to that reported in previous studies (Ando and Hoshino, 1990), while Gram-negative bacteria including F. nucleatum, P. gingivalis, and P. intermedia were commonly recovered. Clearly, Gram-negative obligate anaerobic bacteria are more frequently found, and in higher cell numbers, in infected root canals than in carious and non-carious infected dentin. Undoubtedly, the application of novel molecular techniques that detect bacteria in samples without the necessity for laboratory cultivation (Dymock et al., 1996), or the presence of bacteria in situ, will assist greatly in future analyses of infected dentin, root canals, and pulpal tissues.
| (VI) Bacterial Invasion of Radicular Dentin from a Periodontal Pocket |
|---|
|
TopPreviousNext |
|---|
While it is clear that bacteria are able to invade radicular dentin from the periodontal pocket, a contentious issue is whether bacteria invade healthy cementum prior to dentin penetration, or if bacteria gain access to dentin only via breaches in the cementum layer. Several studies have described invasion of the cementum of periodontally diseased teeth (Hartzell, 1911; Daly et al., 1982; Adriaens et al., 1987a,b; Giuliana et al., 1997). However, it was not evident from any of these studies if the invaded cementum was intact, healthy, or diseased. Exposed cementum is a thin, often discontinuous layer (Moskow, 1969), and commonly shows surface defects, e.g., at sites where Sharpey's fibers attach to the cementum matrix (Adriaens et al., 1987b). Exposure of cementum to crevicular fluid, bacterial enzymes, or acidic metabolites may induce physicochemical and structural alterations, such as localized resorptive lacunae or demineralization (Daly et al., 1982; Eide et al., 1984; Adriaens et al., 1987b). It seems likely, therefore, that bacterial invasion of exposed cementum associated with periodontal disease occurs after the cementum has been altered by physiological, bacterial, or environmental factors.
| (VII) Bacterial Invasion in vitro |
|---|
|
TopPreviousNext |
|---|
) (Table 4). In contrast, invasion of dentin by mono-cultures of Gram-negative anaerobic bacteria is less clear, but invasion has not been generally recognized. Neither Bacteroides melaninogenicus ss. melaninogenicus nor P. intermedia (Akpata and Blechman, 1982; Perez et al., 1993) invaded root dentin after 21-28 days' incubation. On the other hand, limited invasion by P. intermedia has been reported (Berkiten et al., 2000), while P. endodontalis and P. gingivalis both showed low-level penetration of dentinal tubules of bovine roots that had the cementum removed (Siqueira et al., 1996).
|
| (VIII) Factors Influencing Tubule Invasion by Bacteria |
|---|
|
TopPreviousNext |
|---|
Depth of bacterial invasion may depend, at least in part, upon tubule diameter, since this determines the rate of solute diffusion (Pashley, 1992). Sclerotic or obliterated tubules will physically impede bacterial invasion and can result in regional differences in bacterial invasion of dentin. Invasion of coronal and mid-root dentin occurs readily by S. gordonii, while the extent and depth of invasion are significantly less in apical dentin (Love, 1996b). This is because of the lower number of patent tubules in this region due to dentinal sclerosis, which is always more advanced in the apical region compared with coronal and mid-root dentin at any age.
Intact cementum is crucial to limitation of the bacterial invasion of radicular dentinal tubules from the pulpal surface. Penetration is enhanced when the overlying cementum is resorbed (Valderhaug, 1974; Haapasalo and Ørstavik, 1987; Love, 1996b), a common occurrence in the presence of inflammatory periapical disease and after traumatic injuries that damage the periodontal ligament.
Limiting nutritional supply may influence the depth of bacterial penetration. This is partly dependent upon the patency of the tubule, since diffusion of substances into tubules from the oral cavity or pulpal fluid is proportional to tubule diameter (discussed above). This may account for the higher numbers of cariogenic bacteria present within superficial dentin (Edwardsson, 1987), where the presence of fermentable carbohydrates and oxygen from the oral cavity is likely to be higher than in deeper dentin. Also, the anaerobic environment and the possible presence of tissue components, e.g., hemin, within dentin close to the pulp is likely to favor growth and survival of organisms such as P. intermedia and P. gingivalis (Hahn et al., 1990).
(B) BACTERIAL ADHESION
The pivotal nature of streptococcal interactions with deposited salivary proteins and glycoproteins on oral surfaces and other organisms is well-recognized in the development of the complex dental plaque biofilms (Gibbons, 1984; Malamud, 1985; Banas et al., 1990; Terpenning et al., 1993; Kolenbrander, 2000). A great many streptococcal protein adhesins have been identified that can interact with salivary molecules. These include the antigen I/II family polypeptides (Jenkinson and Demuth, 1997), amylase-binding proteins (Scannapieco, 1994), surface lectins (Murray et al., 1986; Takahashi et al., 1997), fimbrial adhesins (Oligino and Fives-Taylor, 1993; Wu and Fives-Taylor, 1999), EP-GP binding protein (Schenkels et al., 1993), and glucan-binding proteins GBP74 (Banas et al., 1990) and GBP59 (Smith et al., 1994). The possession of multiple salivary adhesins favors colonization by a range of mechanisms. Interbacterial co-aggregation is also an important aspect in plaque development (Kolenbrander and London, 1993). Streptococci co-adhere with other early colonizers, such as Actinomyces spp., and are also bound by later colonizers such as P. gingivalis and B. forsythus (Lamont et al., 1992; Yao et al., 1996). Later colonizers are often strict anaerobes and increase in plaque when a more anaerobic environment develops, which may be due, in part, to the actions of earlier colonizers. Despite our extensive knowledge about adhesive interactions between bacteria and substrates in the oral cavity, the influence of bacterial adhesion and inter-bacterial binding in tubule invasion is relatively poorly understood.
Collagen type I, a major organic component of dentin, is recognized by oral streptococci, and when absorbed onto hydroxyapatite surfaces, it serves as an adhesion substrate (Liu and Gibbons, 1990; Liu et al., 1990). Strains of S. mutans are able to bind to unmineralized collagen and to particles of root dentin (Switalski et al., 1993). The ability of oral streptococci to bind to collagen may facilitate bacterial adhesion to exposed dentin or cementum, and subsequently tissue penetration. The antigen I/II polypeptides, expressed on the surfaces of most indigenous species of oral streptococci (Jenkinson and Demuth, 1997), play a major role in mediating adhesion of streptococci to collagen (Love et al., 1997). Strains of P. gingivalis also readily bind to collagen-coated hydroxyapatite, and to bovine bone collagen (Naito and Gibbons, 1988; Naito et al., 1993). This binding is due, at least in part, to the adhesion fimbriae that bind strongly to collagen in vitro (Naito et al., 1993). Fimbriae are involved in other adhesive interactions important in host colonization by P. gingivalis, such as binding to salivary receptors, epithelial cells, fibronectin, and other oral bacteria (Isogai et al., 1988; Goulbourne and Ellen, 1991; Li et al., 1991; Lamont and Jenkinson, 2000), and in the invasion of epithelial cells (Lamont et al., 1995; Weinberg et al., 1997).
Recent data have provided strong evidence for bacterial adhesion specificity as playing a major role in determining the invasion of dentinal tubules. Experiments utilizing isogenic mutants of S. gordonii or S. mutans deficient in the expression of antigen I/II polypeptide surface adhesins clearly demonstrate that these polypeptides not only mediate streptococcal binding to collagen, but also are necessary for bacterial invasion of dentin (Love et al., 1997). It seems that recognition of type I collagen may facilitate bacterial adhesion to dentin (Fig. 2) as well as a morphological growth response manifested by long-chaining of streptococcal cells (Love et al., 1997). In support of this suggestion, acid-soluble type I collagen fragments completely inhibit dentinal tubule penetration by streptococci in vitro (Fig. 3B). These and subsequent experiments with mixed cultures of oral bacteria have led to the following model (Fig. 4) for dentinal tubule invasion by streptococci and P. gingivalis. It is envisaged that antigen I/II family polypeptides produced by S. gordonii, S. mutans, and other oral streptococci mediate primary binding of bacteria to intratubular collagen type I. Streptococcal growth and metabolism promotes localized demineralization together with release of collagen peptides. The presence of these peptides leads to up-regulation of antigen I/II polypeptide production (Love et al., 1997), enhanced adhesion, and facilitates community growth within and along the dentinal tubules (Figs. 2, 4). While P. gingivalis cells are able to bind collagen, this is not sufficient in itself to promote tubule invasion by these organisms in mono-culture. However, when P. gingivalis cells are co-cultivated with S. gordonii cells, invasion by the porphyromonads is promoted. This appears to depend upon the specific adherent interaction between S. gordonii and P. gingivalis cells, mediated by the streptococcal antigen I/II polypeptides (Love et al., 2000). Invasion is not dependent upon production of major adhesion fimbriae by P. gingivalis, that bind collagen, since isogenic P. gingivalis mutants defective in major fimbriae are still able to co-invade with S. gordonii (Love et al., 2000). On the other hand, the antigen I/II polypeptide SpaP of S. mutans binds only weakly to P. gingivalis cells, and S. mutans cells do not allow the invasion of dentinal tubules by P. gingivalis (Love et al., 2000).
|
Analysis of these data demonstrates that specific adherent interactions between oral bacteria may facilitate tubule invasion. The observations should stimulate more detailed investigations of other bacterial interactions and their role in determining the composition of the dentinal and root canal microflora and the outcome of endodontic infections.
| (IX) Summary and Future Prospects |
|---|
|
TopPreviousNext |
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
Top |
|---|
Adriaens PA, Edwards CA, De Boever JA, Loesche WJ (1987b). Ultrastructural observations on bacterial invasion in cementum and radicular dentin of periodontally diseased human teeth. J Periodontol 59:493–503.
Akpata ES, Blechman H (1982). Bacterial invasion of pulpal dentin wall in vitro.
J Dent Res 61:435–438.
Ando N, Hoshino E (1990). Predominant obligate anaerobes invading the deep layers of root canal dentine. Int Endodont J 23:20–27.
Banas JA, Russell RRB, Ferretti JJ (1990). Sequence analysis of the gene for the glucan-binding protein of Streptococcus mutans Ingbritt. Infect Immun 58:667–673.
Bergenholtz G (1981). Inflammatory responses of the dental pulp to bacterial irritation. J Endodont 7:100–104. [Medline]
Berkiten M, Okar I, Berkiten R (2000). In vitro study of the penetration of Streptococcus sanguis and Prevotella intermedia strains into human dentinal tubules. J Endodont 26:236–239. [Medline]
Bowden GHW (1990). Microbiology of root surface caries in humans. J Dent Res 69:1205–1210.
Brännström M (1986). The hydrodynamic theory of dentinal pain: sensation in preparations, caries, and the dentinal crack syndrome. J Endodont 12:453–457. [Medline]
Brännström M, Nyborg H (1971). The presence of bacteria in cavities filled with silicate cement and composite resin materials. Swed Dent J 64:149–155.
Carlsson J, Frolander F, Sundqvist G (1977). Oxygen tolerance of anaerobic bacteria isolated from necrotic dental pulps. Acta Odontol Scand 35:139–145. [Medline]
Carrigan P, Morse JDR, Furst ML, Sinai IH (1984). A scanning electron microscope evaluation of human dentinal tubules according to age and location. J Endodont 10:359–363. [Medline]
Cowan M, Taylor MKG, Doyle RJ (1986). Kinetic analysis of Streptococcus sanguis adhesion to artificial pellicle. J Dent Res 65:1278–1283.
Dahlén G, Bergenholtz G (1980). Endodontic activity in teeth with necrotic pulps. J Dent Res 59:1033–1040.
Dai X-F, Ten Cate AR, Limeback H (1991). The extent and distribution of intratubular collagen fibrils in human dentine. Arch Oral Biol 36:775–778. [Medline]
Daly C, Seymour G, Kieser J, Corbet E (1982). Histological assessment of periodontally involved cementum. J Clin Periodontol 9:266–274. [Medline]
Dawes C, MacPherson LMD (1993). The distribution of saliva and sucrose around the mouth during the use of chewing gum and the implications for the site specificity of caries and calculus deposition. J Dent Res 72:852–857.
Delivanis PD, Fan VSC (1984). The localisation of blood-borne bacteria in instrumented unfilled and overinstrumented canals. J Endodont 19:521–524.
Duncan MJ, Nakao S, Skobe Z, Xie H (1993). Interactions of Porphyromonas gingivalis with epithelial cells. Infect Immun 61:2260–2265.
Dymock D, Weightman AJ, Scully C, Wade WG (1996). Molecular analysis of microflora associated with dentoalveolar abscesses. J Clin Microbiol 34:3537–3542.
Edwardsson S (1974). Bacteriological studies on deep areas of carious dentine. Odontol Revy 25(Suppl 32):1–143. [Medline]
Edwardsson S (1987). Bacteriology of dentin caries. In: Dentine and dentine reactions in the oral cavity. Thylstrup A, Leach SA, Qvist V, editors. Oxford: IRL Press Ltd., pp. 95-102.
Eide B, Lie T, Selvig KA (1984). Surface coatings on dental cementum incident to periodontal disease. II. Scanning electron microscope confirmation of a mineralized cuticle. J Clin Periodontol 11:565–575. [Medline]
Elder BL, Fives-Taylor P (1986). Characterization of monoclonal antibodies specific for adhesion: isolation of adhesin of Streptococcus sanguis FW213. Infect Immun 54:421–427.
Fabricius L, Dahlén G, Öhman A, Möller ÅJR (1982a). Predominant indigenous oral bacteria isolated from infected root canals after varied times of closure. Scand J Dent Res 90:134–144. [Medline]
Fabricius L, Dahlén G, Holm SE, Möller ÅJR (1982b). Influence of combinations of oral bacteria on periapical tissues of monkeys. Scand J Dent Res 90:200–206. [Medline]
Garberoglio R, Brännström M (1976). Scanning electron microscopic investigation of human dentinal tubules. Arch Oral Bio 21:355–362.
Gibbons RJ (1984). Microbial ecology: adherent interactions which may affect microbial ecology in the mouth. J Dent Res 63:378–385.
Gibbons RJ (1989). Bacterial adhesion to oral tissues: a model for infectious diseases. J Dent Res 68:750–760.
Gillaspy AF, Patti JM, Smeltzer MS (1997). Transcriptional recognition of the Staphylococcus aureus collagen adhesin gene cna. Infect Immun 65:1536–1540. [Abstract]
Giuliana G, Ammatuna P, Pizzo G, Capone F, D'Angelo M (1997). Occurrence of invading bacteria in radicular dentin pf periodontally diseased teeth: microbiological findings. J Clin Periodontol 24:478–485. [Medline]
Goulbourne PA, Ellen RP (1991). Evidence that Porphyromonas (Bacteroides) gingivalis fimbriae function in adhesion to Actinomyces viscosus. J Bacteriol 173:5266–5274.
Haapasalo M (1989). Bacteroides spp. in dental root canal infections. Endod Dent Traumatol 5:1–10. [Medline]
Haapasalo M, Ørstavik D (1987). In vitro infection and disinfection of dentinal tubules. J Dent Res 66:1375–1379.
Hahn C-L, Overton B (1997). The effects of immunoglobulins on the convective permeability of human dentine in vitro. Arch Oral Biol 42:835–843. [Medline]
Hahn C-L, Falkler WA Jr, Minah GE (1990). Microbiological studies of carious dentine from human teeth with irreversible pulpitis. Arch Oral Biol 36:147–153.
Hartzell T (1911). The practical surgery of the root surface in pyorrhea. Dent Cosmos 53:513–521.
Hashioka K, Yamasaki M, Nakane A, Horiba N, Nakamura H (1992). The relationship between clinical symptoms and anaerobic bacteria from infected root canals. J Endodont 18:558–561. [Medline]
Hasty DL, Ofek I, Courtney HS, Doyle RJ (1992). Multiple adhesins of streptococci. Infect Immun 60:2147–2152.
Hill PE, Knox KW, Schamschula RG, Tabua J (1977). The identification and enumeration of actinomyces from plaque of New Guinea indigenes. Caries Res 11:327–335. [Medline]
Hoshino E (1985). Predominant obligate anaerobes in human carious dentin. J Dent Res 64:1195–1198.
Isogai H, Isogai E, Yoshimura F, Suzuki T, Kagota W, Takano K (1988). Specific inhibition of adherence of an oral strain of Bacteroides gingivalis 381 to epithelial cells by monoclonal antibodies against the bacterial fimbriae. Arch Oral Biol 33:479–485. [Medline]
Izumi T, Yamada K, Inoue H, Watanabe K, Nishigawa Y (1998). Fibrinogen/fibrin and fibronectin in the dentin-pulp complex after cavity preparation in rat molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 86:587–591. [Medline]
Jenkinson HF (1994). Cell surface protein receptors. FEMS Microbiol Lett 121:133–140. [Medline]
Jenkinson HF, Demuth DR (1997). Structure, function and immunogenicity of streptococcal antigen I/II polypeptides. Molec Microbiol 23:183–190. [Medline]
Jenkinson HF, Lamont RJ (1997). Streptococcal adhesion and colonization. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 8:175–200.
Jontell M, Okiji T, Dahlgren U, Bergenholtz G (1998). Immune defense mechanisms of the dental pulp. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 9:179–200.
Jung I-Y, Choi B-k, Kum K-Y, Roh B-D, Lee S-J, Lee C-Y, et al. (2000). Molecular epidemiology and association of putative pathogens in root canal infection. J Endodont 26:599–604. [Medline]
Kakehashi S, Stanley HR, Fitzgerald RJ (1965). The effects of surgical exposures of dental pulps in germ-free and conventional laboratory rats. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 20:340–349. [Medline]
Kantz WE, Henry CA (1974). Isolation and classification of anaerobic bacteria from intact pulp chambers of non-vital teeth in man. Arch Oral Biol 19:91–96. [Medline]
Keyes PH (1960). The infectious and transmissible nature of experimental caries. Findings and implications. Arch Oral Biol 1:304–320.
Knutsson G, Jontell M, Bergenholtz G (1994). Determination of plasma proteins in dentinal fluid from cavities prepared in healthy young human teeth. Arch Oral Biol 39:185–190. [Medline]
Kolenbrander PE (2000). Oral microbial communities: biofilms, interactions, and genetic systems. Annu Rev Microbiol 54:413–437. [Medline]
Kolenbrander PE, London J (1993). Adhere today, here tomorrow: oral bacterial adherence. J Bacteriol 175:3247–3253.
Kopczyk R, Conroy C (1968). The attachment of calculus to root planed surfaces. Periodontics 6:78–83. [Medline]
Lamont RJ, Rosan B, Murphy GM, Baker CT (1988a). Streptococcus sanguis surface antigens and their interactions with saliva. Infect Immun 56:64–70.
Lamont RJ, Rosan B, Baker CT, Nelson GM (1988b). Characterization of an adhesin antigen of Strepto
). Growth of streptococci in the presence of collagen peptides leads to up-regulation of antigen I/II production (