CROBM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scala, A.
Right arrow Articles by Giamberardino, M.A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scala, A.
Right arrow Articles by Giamberardino, M.A.

UPDATE ON BURNING MOUTH SYNDROME: OVERVIEW AND PATIENT MANAGEMENT

A. Scala*
L. Checchi
M. Montevecchi
I. Marini

Department of Oral Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of Bologna, Via San Vitale 59, 40125 Bologna, Italy;

M.A. Giamberardino

Department of Medicine and Science of Ageing, University of Chieti, Via dei Vestini, 66013 Chieti, Italy



View larger version (41K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Possible etiopathogenesis in Burning Mouth Syndrome (BMS). The action of or interaction among one or more either unknown (x, y?) or well-identified (local, systemic, and/or maybe psychogenic) precipitation factors (a) might determine an either reversible ( ) or irreversible ( ->) neuropathic damage/disorder (b), such as peripheral nerve damage(s), dopaminergic system disorder(s), and/or other neurological alterations. These disorders could result in BMS symptoms (c). The etiologic role of psychological distress is still pending. However, long periods of chronic pain may also result in psychogenic disorder(s) (d) , which can intensify BMS symptoms.

 


View larger version (42K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Algorithm for the differential diagnosis of Burning Mouth Syndrome (BMS). (I) Algorithm for BMS diagnosis. (a) Anamnesis: BMS pain is invariably bilateral and often relieved by eating and drinking; in contrast, the pain associated with inflammatory/immunomediated oral lesions may be unilateral and typically aggravated by food. (b) Oral mucosal examination plays a key role; lack of oral mucosal lesions points to BMS diagnosis, whereas changes in the oral mucosa suggest other disease(s) or complicated BMS. (c) Initial diagnosis: A correct anamnesis associated with a careful oral examination may be sufficient for arriving at an initial diagnosis of BMS; both intra- and extra-oral pain levels are measured through a linear Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). (d) Microbiological tests: The microbiological analysis of the oral mucosal areas where the pain is localized may be effective for excluding possible bacterial or fungal invasions. Epicutaneous patch tests are strongly recommended in patients with type 3 BMS. (II) Management of possible oral complication. Patients with oral mucosal lesions must be evaluated for their condition(s). In the case of a painful white lesion removable with a spatula, a microbiological oral culture of a smear sample should be performed to exclude candidiasis or possible bacterial infections. Patients must be administered with topical/systemic antifungal or antibiotic therapy, if fungal or bacterial infections, respectively, are diagnosed. Subjects with painful erythematous lesions may require epicutaneous patch tests for possible allergy. When hypersensitive reactions to denture components are found, removal of the denture may lead to the clearing up of oral symptoms in a few days. Dental examination is performed to exclude the presence of acute gingivitis, periodontitis, and/or other painful oral conditions. Appropriate oral hygiene interventions and dental treatments may contribute to relieving suffering of patients. Erosive-ulcerative lesions, which do not disappear after 2 weeks, must be considered for a peri-lesional biopsy. When inflammatory/immunomediated diseases are diagnosed, appropriate treatment management should be provided. Persistence of the pain after proper treatments of such conditions is necessary for a diagnosis of complicated BMS.

 


View larger version (60K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Algorithm for the final diagnosis of "Primary BMS" or "Secondary BMS". (a) Diagnostic procedure: This examination should be focused on the detection of local/systemic factors associated with the syndrome; dental/denture assessment may indicate a basis for potential functional/parafunctional habits and/or dental design errors; sialometry and sialochemistry may provide diagnosis of hyposalivation and salivary composition changes, respectively; taste and sensory function tests may confirm (or exclude) neuropathic disorders; hematological exams must include full blood cell count and differential, hematinic assays, evaluation of vitamin B status and folate, and blood glucose levels. (b) Final diagnosis: When the clinical examination shows one or more of the above factors in a BMS subject, the patient is considered as affected with "Associated BMS", as a result of local and/or systemic factors. Patients with normal local/systemic evaluation are considered to have "Idiopathic BMS". (c) Psychological evaluation: The goal is to detect the psychogenic pain component of the patients by means of proper structured interviews and/or psychodynamic questionnaires.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2003 Institutional Access Guidelines