Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, Vol 8, 410-436, Copyright © 1997 by International & American Associations for Dental Research

ARTICLES

Mercury exposure from dental amalgam fillings: absorbed dose and the potential for adverse health effects

J. R. Mackert Jr and A. Berglund
Medical College of Georgia, Augusta 30912-1260, USA.

This review examines the question of whether adverse health effects are attributable to amalgam-derived mercury. The issue of absorbed dose of mercury from amalgam is addressed first. The use of intra-oral Hg vapor measurements to estimate daily uptake must take into account the differences between the collection volume and flow rate of the measuring instrument and the inspiratory volume and flow rate of air through the mouth during inhalation of a single breath. Failure to account for these differences will result in substantial overestimation of the absorbed dose. Other factors that must be considered when making estimates of Hg uptake from amalgam include the accurate measurement of baseline (unstimulated) mercury release rates and the greater stimulation of Hg release afforded by chewing gum relative to ordinary food. The measured levels of amalgam-derived mercury in brain, blood, and urine are shown to be consistent with low absorbed doses (1-3 micrograms/day). Published relationships between the number of amalgam surfaces and urine levels are used to estimate the number of amalgam surfaces that would be required to produce the 30 micrograms/g creatinine urine mercury level stated by WHO to be associated with the most subtle, pre-clinical effects in the most sensitive individuals. From 450 to 530 amalgam surfaces would be required to produce the 30 micrograms/g creatinine urine mercury level for people without any excessive gum-chewing habits. The potential for adverse health effects and for improvement in health following amalgam removal is also addressed. Finally, the issue of whether any material can ever be completely exonerated of claims of producing adverse health effects is considered.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M.C. Roberts, B.G. Leroux, J. Sampson, H.S. Luis, M. Bernardo, and J. Leitao Dental Amalgam and Antibiotic- and/or Mercury-resistant Bacteria J. Dent. Res., May 1, 2008; 87(5): 475 - 479. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Schiff No Neurobehavioral Effect of Mercury in Dental Amalgam AAP Grand Rounds, July 1, 2006; 16(1): 80 - 81. [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. A. DeRouen, M. D. Martin, B. G. Leroux, B. D. Townes, J. S. Woods, J. Leitao, A. Castro-Caldas, H. Luis, M. Bernardo, G. Rosenbaum, et al. Neurobehavioral effects of dental amalgam in children: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA, April 19, 2006; 295(15): 1784 - 1792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Liu, D. Lei, M. P. Waalkes, R. P. Beliles, and D. L. Morgan Genomic Analysis of the Rat Lung following Elemental Mercury Vapor Exposure Toxicol. Sci., July 1, 2003; 74(1): 174 - 181. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. E. DODES The amalgam controversy: An evidence-based analysis J Am Dent Assoc, March 1, 2001; 132(3): 348 - 356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. W. ROBERTS, D. LEONARD, and J. OSBORNE Potential health and environmental issues of mercury-contaminated amalgamators J Am Dent Assoc, January 1, 2001; 132(1): 58 - 64. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]