|
|
||||||||
1 Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, LHRB 156, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294-0007, USA; 2 Research and Development Department, Swedish National Food Administration, Uppsala, Sweden
* corresponding author, rodu{at}uab.edu
CONTROVERSY
Most health professionals recognize that smokeless tobacco (SLT) use is associated with oral cancer. However, many have an exaggerated perception of the magnitude of the risk, and there is little understanding or discussion of historical and contemporary scientific data relevant to the association. This review by Rodu and Jansson establishes that SLT use carries only modest risk for oral cancer, and it further describes the key agents in SLT that play important roles in raisingor even loweringthis risk. In other words, it challenges conventional perceptions about SLT use and provides interesting and surprising information about SLT products. Olav Alvares, Editor
Smokeless tobacco has been associated with oral cancer for many decades. The purpose of this article is to review research relevant to this association, including epidemiologic studies, studies of putative carcinogens such as tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNAs) and other contaminants, and possible cancer inhibitors. Epidemiologic studies addressing this issue primarily consist of case-control studies. They show that the use of chewing tobacco and moist snuff is associated with very low risks for cancers of the oral cavity and related structures (relative risks [RR] from 0.6 to 1.7). The use of dry snuff is associated with higher RRs, ranging from 4 to 13, while the RRs from smokeless tobacco, unspecified as to type, are intermediate (RR = 1.5 to 2.8). With regard to TSNAs, historical levels in American moist snuff products were higher than those in their Swedish counterparts, but levels in contemporary products are uniformly low. TSNA levels in chewing tobacco have always been low, but levels in dry snuff have been higher, including some very high levels in current products. In general, smokeless tobacco users are not exposed to significant levels of cadmium, lead, benzo(a)pyrene, polonium-210, and formaldehyde, when compared with concentrations of these compounds in foods. Finally, low oral cancer risk from smokeless tobacco use may be influenced by the presence of cancer inhibitors, mainly anti-oxidants, in smokeless tobacco products.
Key words. Smokeless tobacco, oral cancer, case-control studies, tobacco-specific nitrosamines, anti-oxidants
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Stenstrom, C.-M. Zhao, A. B. Rogers, H.-O. Nilsson, E. Sturegard, S. Lundgren, J. G. Fox, T. C. Wang, T. M. Wadstrom, and D. Chen Swedish moist snuff accelerates gastric cancer development in Helicobacter pylori-infected wild-type and gastrin transgenic mice Carcinogenesis, September 1, 2007; 28(9): 2041 - 2046. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. N Lee Circulatory disease and smokeless tobacco in Western populations: a review of the evidence Int. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2007; 36(4): 789 - 804. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. K. Avti, S. Kumar, C. M. Pathak, K. Vaiphei, and K. L. Khanduja Smokeless Tobacco Impairs the Antioxidant Defense in Liver, Lung, and Kidney of Rats Toxicol. Sci., February 1, 2006; 89(2): 547 - 553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H Furberg, C M Bulik, C Lerman, P Lichtenstein, N L Pedersen, and P F Sullivan Is Swedish snus associated with smoking initiation or smoking cessation? Tob. Control, December 1, 2005; 14(6): 422 - 424. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Wen and T. Walle Preferential induction of CYP1B1 by benzo[a]pyrene in human oral epithelial cells: impact on DNA adduct formation and prevention by polyphenols Carcinogenesis, October 1, 2005; 26(10): 1774 - 1781. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| IADR Journals | Advances in Dental Research ® | Journal of Dental Research ® | Critical Reviews (1990-2004) |